Petitioners argue new rules discriminate against general category students; urgent hearing sought over controversial definitions
The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine a Public Interest Litigation challenging the University Grants Commission’s (UGC) new regulations on caste-based discrimination, which have sparked widespread controversy.
Advocate Parth Yadav, representing the petitioners, requested an urgent hearing before a bench led by Chief Justice Sanjay Kant. He argued that certain provisions in the regulations promote discrimination against general category students. “We are also aware of what is happening,” CJI Kant responded, directing the counsel to address any defects and provide the case number for listing.
The petition, filed by businessman Rahul Dewan, retired IAS officer Sanjay Dixit, and others, challenges specific regulations notified on January 13, 2026. They contend that Regulations 3(1)(c), 8(b), and 8(c) violate Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution.
The petitioners specifically oppose Regulation 3(1)(c), which defines “caste-based discrimination” as discrimination only against SC, ST, and OBC members. They call this definition “draconian” and argue it institutionalizes an exclusionary framework.
The plea clarifies that petitioners support protection for SC/ST and backward classes but insist general category students must not face discrimination, injustice, or indignity.
About The Author
